Also speaking at the session were co-authors Philip Candilis, M.D., a professor of psychiatry and behavioral sciences at George Washington University School of Medicine; Allen Dyer, M.D., Ph.D., emeritus professor of psychiatry at George Washington; and Najat Khalifa, M.D., professor and director of Research at the Queen’s University Department of Psychiatry in Kingston, Ontario.
The speakers emphasized that the pathway to violence is a multifaceted process with no single theory or approach to explain it. Although research has focused on understanding the process in crime, interpersonal violence, and terrorism, there has been a dearth of studies on empirically driven pathways.
The authors defined an empirically driven pathway to violence based on interviews with a sample of 160 Iraqi individuals convicted of terrorism under the Iraqi Terrorism Law. They employed “path analysis” — a statistical method of analyzing the interdependent relationship of multiple variables to a specific outcome acting through multiple possible pathways.
Specifically, they looked at the pathways between and among ACES, conduct disorder, antisocial personality disorder, religious commitment, political commitment, religion as a guiding principle, attitudes to terrorism, and severity of terrorist acts.
|