Applebaum is a signatory to The Hopkins-Oxford Psychedelics Ethics (HOPE) Workshop Consensus Statement.
Also speaking at the session were Natalie Gukasyan, M.D., an assistant professor of psychiatry at Columbia University Medical Center, who spoke about studies of psylocibin-assisted therapy that she helped lead at the Johns Hopkins Behavioral Pharmacology Research Unit; and Amy McGuire, J.D., Ph.D., director of the Center for Medical Ethics and Health Policy and head of the Ethical and Legal Implications of PSychedelics In Society (ELIPSIS) program at Baylor College of Medicine.
Appelbaum outlined broad ethical concerns about informed consent in studies of psychedelic compounds, how to ensure appropriate use, and the effect of exclusion criteria in clinical trials on communicating risk of adverse effects.
“I would suggest that for patients to provide a meaningful consent, they really need to understand and appreciate likely effects that the treatment is going to have—but there's a challenge because some of the effects of psychedelics are inherently difficult to convey,” Appelbaum said. He cited such ineffable experiences as “oceanic boundlessness,” transformation of awareness, dissolution of ego, and shifts in values or personality that are sometimes reported by psychedelic users. “How do we deal with the reality that these are very difficult experiences to convey?”
Informed consent also requires prospective patients to know and understand what may happen in the course of the psychedelic-assisted therapy session itself. “Therapeutic touch” is often employed when patients become highly anxious or fearful. “Touching patients is something that we are all discouraged from doing in our training, and it is not concordant with the usual mainstream approaches to treatment particularly in psychotherapeutic settings for good reason,” Appelbaum said. He added that patients can be highly suggestible under the influence of psychedelics, and boundary violations are not unheard of.
|